Jennifer Aniston to cameo on Chelsea Handler?s sitcom, it?s not enough for Chelsea

Jennifer Aniston to cameo on Chelsea Handler?s sitcom, it?s not enough for Chelsea

wenn5687224
A couple of weeks ago, the National Enquirer reported that Chelsea Handler was begging her maybe-BFF, Jennifer Aniston, to help her out with her flailing life story sitcom, ?Are You There Vodka? It?s Me Chelsea.? At that point, Aniston was reportedly refusing to do a cameo at all, but had agreed to look over some scripts for Chelsea and give advice. According to the Enquirer, Aniston has caved and agreed to do a cameo but Chelsea is pushing her to join the cast full time. Of course Aniston is too busy doing photo ops with her boyfriend and having phone conferences with her publicist to do that, and Chelsea thinks that a ?real slap in the face.?

After refusing to appear at all, Jen finally agreed to make a cameo appearance [on "Are You There, Vodka? It's Me Chelsea."] - but that?s not enough for Chelsea, say sources.

?Chelsea?s hurt,? an insider revealed. ?She?s taking Jen?s ?thanks, but no thanks? as a real slap in the face.?

According to sources, the ?Chelsea Lately? host is ?facing a disaster? with her new show after three main stars were axed before production even started. The pilot episode was a bomb - it wasn?t funny and the characters were unlikable,? the insider divulged. ?Now they?ve decided to recast and go in a new direction.

And Chelsea?s tearing her hair out trying to save it?

She figured adding Jen to the mix would make the show a surefire hit. But the former ?Friends? star insists she?s too busy with new boyfriend Justin Theroux and her budding career as a director.

?Unless it?s a cameo role or a turn as a director of one of the episodes,? said the insider, ?Jen is out.?

[From The National Enquirer, print edition, September 12, 2011]

If this story is true, what?s it going to take to please Chelsea? Will Aniston have to join the cast as a regular member and hitch her star to this lousy excuse for a sitcom? Yes Aniston shines in sitcoms, but she can?t save a show that?s headed for the crapper. It?s already very generous of her to agree to do a cameo for Chelsea. Chelsea sounds like one of those friends who expects way too much and then holds a grudge forever when you try to graciously refuse one of their outrageous requests.

This show still has no release date on NBC?s website, and it?s supposed to premiere sometime ?mid season.?

wenn3429360

wenn5686926

Photos are from 7/7/11, with Justin Bateman. Credit: WENN.com

Written by Celebitchy

Share

Posted in Chelsea Handler, Friends, Jennifer Aniston, Photos


- Celebrities talk about their cheating [The Frisky]
- Jessica Biel looks smug [Lainey Gossip]
- Slash got married! [D-Listed]
- James Franco gets a beat down [HuffPo]
- Fug or Fab: Ashley Tisdale [Go Fug Yourself]
- The TV love triangles of our youth [Pajiba]
- Kate Hudson in a bikini [Popsugar]
- Rick Santorum gets schooled [Gawker]
- Steven Seagal shoots a puppy [Evil Beet]

18 Responses to ?Jennifer Aniston to cameo on Chelsea Handler?s sitcom, it?s not enough for Chelsea?

  1. ummm, I love Jason Bateman

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  2. Um, so she can spend more time making crappy rom coms?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  3. those pictures ruined Slash for me. Always loved him wowza he loks rough

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  4. Say, I?d like to hear Handler rip into Aniston like she does with Jolie and anyone else who?s not her buddy.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  5. chelsea?s point of view would be along the line of:Hey aniston, I had your back and not ONLY attacked The Jolie,but racially attacked her children,too. You OWE me.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  6. Trampy (Aniston) does owe Chelsea for Chelsea being her attack dog. But if trampy had any brains she?d stay far away from Handler and not associate with her at all let alone being friends.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  7. Chelsea looks like she?s had her face tweeked?well she needed it.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  8. They seem to be morphing into the same person?same hair-both style and color, same smile, same body language.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  9. She sounds like one of those ?friends? who remember that one time they did something really nice for you or a favor (that you didn?t even ask for) and lord it over your head when they have some outrageous demand.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  10. this is Aniston trying desperately to hold on to her image.
    too late you hypocritical homewrecker.
    having friends like Handler is all i need to know about you now.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  11. The last time she had Aniston on her show a couple of weeks ago (where Aniston was waaaaasted) they read a National Enquirer article together and laughed about how ridiculous it was so I?m inclined to think these stories are completely made up. Plus its the National Enquirer guys. Has everyone really forgotten how full of crap they are just because they occasionally get a real scoop?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  12. Agree with #1 and #10

    Anniston has the right to decide her own career path. She certainly doesn?t ?owe? Handler anything.

    As to Handler being JA?s ?attack dog?, I don?t think so. Handler and the majority of other comedians have used AJ and BP and their children as comic fodder. I do think that Handler was really nasty about it and it wasn?t funny at that point. How JA is responsible for Handler?s alcohol fueled routine is beyond me. I know though that others will subscribe to the fact that Handler did it ?for? JA. It looked bad for both of them and I think JA is too smart to make that kind of mistake.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  13. God, this woman sounds exhausting.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  14. ?her budding career as a director.?

    bawhat?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  15. She looks ridiculous in the picture where you can clearly see her tongue behind her teeth so she thinks she can get a better smile.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  16. I don?t buy the story, although I could see Chelsea doing some arm-twisting, especially if Aniston was stupid enough to allow her to get, even, a peek of Aniston?s inner circle.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  17. I?d love to see all Jen?s photo ops with her new boyfriend, where are they???

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

Leave a Reply

Celebitchy aims to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules. You must be 13 or older to comment. This site is not intended for anyone under 13.

Note: due to excessive spam, the .info domain had to be banned. Please do not post links or use an e-mail address from a .info domain.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy

Use the "Report this comment as spam or abuse" link to ask the moderators to delete a comment if it's offensive. If your comment disappears, it has been eaten by the spam filter. Please e-mail cbcomments at gmail.com to get it retrieved.

Get an icon next to your name by signing up for a free Gravatar



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://www.celebitchy.com/178183/jennifer_aniston_agrees_to_cameo_on_chelsea_handlers_sitcom_its_not_enough_for_chelsea/

celebrity photos celebrity gossip celebrity hairstyle celebrity look a like celebrity diets

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...